Update on Profindpages and Profindsearch

Its been a while since I posted anything, but I wanted to let everyone know what is happening.

Profindpages may be back online (hopefully) in the early part of December. If it is, there will be a number of changes made to its appearance and it may take a few weeks to make these alterations.

Google have decided to stop taking News articles from Profindsearch (just as they did on Profindpages). No reason was given for their decision, but then, they are the mighty Google, so perhaps they don't think they have to.

I was curious to see whether other News sites were also getting the same treatment on Google News and I was surprised to find some "big" names included. Google have effectively two groups that they take articles from. The "A" group can get its articles shown on all the main pages. But if you are in the "B" group, your articles are accepted, but do not appear on the main pages. If you check on Google News you can see an example of this.

Go to the top stories page and click on the "related" link on any of the articles. This will produce a list of sites that have written articles a few minutes ago, a few hours ago and sometimes a few days ago. As you look through this list you will discover that, after a number of entries, the articles written a few hours or days ago, suddenly start showing stories that were written more recently. But are placed at the bottom of the earlier entries.

These are the two groups. The earlier entries are the "favoured" sites, and the remainder are not!

If you make a list of the sites that appear in the favoured group, you will find that they have something in common. To give you a clue, check to see who owns or runs them. If you dig deep enough, you may find that that these "people" have current or historic roots in Russia. But then, so does the founder of Google, a coincidence? (Probably not).

This is just another example of who provides the News and what News they want you to hear!

Sadly, sites like mine (and almost all the other websites that provide alternative news) rely on the mainstream media to get exposure. But if you are not a member of the right "Club", they don't allow you to get seen.

Now that we have been gagged again, we don't have to worry about writing articles that may get us removed from Google News. So the News we provide on Profindsearch will include articles that are not restricted in any way.

We have also set up a Forum where we are discussing a number of different topics and you can check this out HERE

The Forum is quite new, but it already has more than 50 members and almost 2,000 articles posted. You are of course very welcome to visit and post your comments there (open new topics if you wish). As it is part of my site, it's easier for me to visit more often (one of the reasons I haven't been able to post here as much as I would like).

I hope you will find a few minutes to check the Forum out and join us in some of the discussions.

Bush adds his own comments on Iran and Syria, shortly after Blair

Yesterday was an interesting day, first Blair accuses Iran of having links to Iraq and then Bush makes a speech along similar lines (adding Syria to the hit list as well).

This was followed very quickly afterwards by an alert on the New York subway. Apparently 19 people were planning to place bombs there or something? The information the NY police obtained on this did not suddenly drop into their lap yesterday, it would have been something they had known about for more than a week (now there's a coincidence!).

As usual the information can not be verified. But what is the purpose of this alert? It could be a strong hint of where the next 9/11 will take place, or just a story to strike a little terror into the public. I tend to go for the latter and think it is just a part of yesterday's propaganda. They did much the same thing before invading Iraq. However, it is a clear indication that the "Iran" situation is hotting up and we can expect something to happen very soon now.

Here's an article for you:

George Bush "radical Islamic empire" or The Empire Strikes Back?

Now, there is another story developing which although appears separate, might well be connected to all of this. I would love to discuss it here, but a previous article on this subject was REMOVED by a certain Search Engine (one article out of more than a thousand) and the News service on the site was cancelled a few days later!

I am convinced that there is a major cover-up in progress and we stumbled upon it almost by accident. At the risk of sounding over-dramatic, it concerns the entire planet and an event that has started, but will become much worse soon. It has nothing to do with terrorists, in fact it has nothing to do with people at all. It could be classed as a "natural" disaster for which there is little or no defence.

As I say, I would love to tell people about this publicly, but there is a very good chance I would get shut down and that wouldn't help. I am currently looking for ways to get the information out without risking my site (again). I have no objections to giving this information in an email and if you would like to hear more on this, please send me an email with your request (just put in the email "send me more info on the cover-up").

Sorry to sound so mysterious, but it is a seriously big story and major governments will not want this known to the general public (with good reason!). I doubt if the mainstream media would be allowed to publish it either.

Please note that if I send this information to you, you may pass the information onto whoever you wish, but do not mention where you got it from (at least not until we are ready to publish it on the internet in the normal way).

Thanks.

Attack on Iran back on the menu!

As we expected, the pressure is back on Iran, now that the News on Hurricane Katrina is fading from the main headlines.

Tony Blair, Bush's war partner, has pushed out the story that Iran is providing explosives technology to the insurgents and just to get the British public to swallow this a little more, he claims that British soldiers were killed as a result.

Like the WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) that never existed in Iraq, we are now being given the same routine for Iran.

This is still only one of the initial steps in the lead up to the attack and we still believe there will be another 9/11 shortly. Some may have noticed in the News recently that Israel got in a little "aerial practice" and it is very possible that they may play a part in the attack.

A link to our latest article is shown below:

Britain points the finger at Iran for links with Iraq

Don't forget, you can leave a comment if you wish, as long as it's not about some dating site in the Ukraine :-)

Could today see a repeat of 4 years ago?

It has been some time since I made a post here, but as some of you know, I have been having problems with one of my sites.

Today is going to be a tense and worrying time for many, will another 9/11 style attack happen? (As we have suggested it might).

It is still possible, but I think nature may have saved us from this event, at least for a while. Although Hurricane Katrina may seem like an unlikely saviour, especially as it might be the cause for some 10,000 deaths, a 9/11 event leading to another war would certainly be more costly.

But if it doesn't happen today (or later this month), that doesn't mean it won't ever happen. This may only be a temporary reprieve.

If a new 9/11 is designed to promote a special reaction (as we believe it is), then it is important to have as many see this as possible. The tactic is very much like any other form of advertising. I remember spending more than a month once on a national advertising campaign (for a previous business) and on the same day that all my adverts appeared across the country, the Gulf War began. Naturally, everyone's attention was focused on that and not my adverts. And the same has happened following Hurricane Katrina, which will remain a top story for some time yet.

You can be sure that a lot of planning will have gone into preparing a new 9/11 and maybe those behind it will still proceed as planned. Maybe some will think this is a good time to do it, who knows? With people devastated by the New Orleans tragedy, perhaps another "disaster" might be very effective and capitalize on the lowered morale of the country.

Hopefully, I won't be returning to post another message in the next 24 hours to bring you reports of bad news, but we must continue to be on our guard, it isn't over yet.

Feel free to post comments, your views are welcome.

Abu Musab al Zarqawi's name being promoted again

In some of the earlier articles we wrote on Profindpages News, we mentioned that al Zarqawi was the person that will eventually be "blamed" for the new 9/11 attack.

We have reprinted our latest article on this below and feel that we can expect to see this name appear much more in the next few weeks. The "connection" between al Zarqawi and Iran will also be promoted strongly and we may see the U.S. intelligence produce what they will call "conclusive" evidence to support this claim. Should this happen, you can expect the "attack" to take place within days of the announcement.

Unlike the previous 9/11 attack, where guilt and motive were placed on the attackers after the event, al Zarqawi is going to be made "guilty" before it happens this time. It's interesting to note that the name of Osama bin Laden has not appeared yet, but then he is busy enjoying his "retirement" in a nice safe house provided by certain members of the U.S. government and protected by U.S. and Pakistani troops (near a place called Chitral in Pakistan that is close to the Afghan border)

al Zarqawi link with Aqaba missile attack suggested
A missile attack in the port of Aqaba, Jordan, which only just missed the USS Ashland, has received suggestions that Abu Musab al Zarqawi may be involved.

Abu Musab al Zarqawi, who we are led to believe is now perhaps more powerful than the elusive Osama bin Laden, is often mentioned as the figure behind many "terrorist" attacks. He is also a figure that the U.S. are trying very hard to connect to Iran.

Even though the missiles fired at Aqaba and Israel were "pea-shooters" compared to many of the attacks al Zarqawi has been blamed for and appear to have been fired by "amateurs", some still try to make a link.

We have thought for some time now that al Zarqawi will be the person blamed for the "new" 9/11 attack, which is getting ever closer. As far as we are aware, al Zarqawi has never been involved in an attack quite like this. But if a connection can be "established" between the Aqaba missile attack, it will be easier to link him to any future attack that uses missiles.

The report concerning al Zarqawi came from Jordanian intelligence experts, but sounds very much like a Bush administration script. As usual, there is no proof to back up this claim and simply looks like a good opportunity to promote the idea that al Zarqawi is going to be the "fall guy" this time.

It was also interesting to hear that audio tapes from al Zarqawi, vowing to punish Jordan's rulers for "aiding the treacherous enemy America", have suddenly been mentioned. Where did these come from and when? And why did we have to wait for this "attack" to happen before anyone mentions them?

We have already seen Iran's name mentioned as been "backers" of one of the groups involved in the Aqaba missile attack, although officials can't seem to make up their minds exactly who to blame for it.

The only thing that is certain, is that Iran will continue to be mentioned in the next few weeks. The purpose of this works on the principle of "Mud sticks!"

Sadly, we feel that another "staged" 9/11 attack is still on the cards and the 11th of September still seems like the most likely date.

Was this recent missile attack a "test run" for something bigger?

We wrote an article some time ago predicting that the next 9/11 "attack" could involve a U.S. Naval ship. Was this a test run or an attempt to show us that such attacks could (and probably will) take place.

A copy of our article on this is shown below. Your comments are welcome.


Missile attack on U.S. Navy ships believed to be connected to Al-Qaeda

(19.08.2005)

At least three missiles were launched from Jordan today in what appeared to be an attempt to hit two U.S. Navy ships docked in the port of Aqaba, Jordan.

One of the missiles narrowly missed the USS Ashland, which has now put out to sea with the USS Kearsage.

Although there were no U.S. casualties, a Jordanian soldier was killed in the attack and at least one other person reportedly injured.

The missile that missed the USS Ashland, landed on a warehouse (that the killed Jordanian soldier was guarding), another landed near an airport in Israel, near the Red Sea resort of Eilat, but did not explode.

A group called "The Abdullah al-Azzam Brigades of the al-Qaeda Organization in the Levant and Egypt" have apparently claimed responsibility for the attack, but this has not been confirmed.

The missiles were launched from a warehouse in Katyusha, Jordan, and authorities are looking for a Syrian and two Iraqis. However, other reports claim that the warehouse was leased to three Iraqis and an Egyptian?

It is uncertain whether any of the missiles actually exploded and this would make the second attack (the second London "bombing" being the first) where unexploding bombs have been used.

Readers may care to read our article (The New 9/11 expected on the same date) dated the 17th of July, which was an update on how we believe the "new" 9/11 will occur. Others believe that this will take place on American soil and although this can't be ruled out, we are going to stick with our original prediction.

Could this latest attack be a test run for the USS Nimitz? Hopefully not, but if it is, be sure to remember our warning and ask plenty of questions afterwards!

Murder of Brazilian man Menezes the subject of lies and a cover up

Our second post for the News Group concerns the Brazilian man who was murdered in the Stockwell Tube Station in London. He was believed to be a suspect bomber, but this turned out to be wrong.

This man was "executed" a point blank range with a total of 8 shots! Various witness reports suggested that he was running away from police and that he was wearing a thick coat (one witness even said they saw him wearing a "bomb belt")

Obviously, someone is lying, but who? Our article (published on Profindpages News) is shown below:

Murder of Brazilian man Menezes followed by lies and cover-up attempts
(17.08.2005)

Leaked documents to the ITV, related to the probe into the "murder" of Brazilian man Jean Charles de Menezes, show a much different picture to that given shortly after his death.

The documents show that Menezes did not hurdle the barrier at Stockwell tube station as previously suggested and he was not wearing a heavy padded coat, but a denim jacket!

The police had followed Menezes into Stockwell Tube station. Menezes had walked (not run) into the station, picked up a free newspaper, walked through (and not jumped over) ticket barriers, and only ran when he saw the train arriving.

On entering the carriage, he looked around for a seat and sat down. A number of "police officers" entered the carriage and it would seem that this is the first time that police actually identified themselves to Menezes. His response (according to the leaked report) was to stand up and walk towards the officers.

Clearly, Menezes had made no attempt to avoid the police during all of this and even got up and walked towards them, when they eventually decided to reveal their identity. Yet despite this, Menezes was pushed back onto the seat in the carriage, held by one of the officers and executed!

But what of all the earlier reports and witness statements immediately after the shooting?

If you check the following BBC article dated 22nd of July http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4706913.stm, you will find witness statements like:

"He [the suspect] had a baseball cap on and quite a sort of thickish coat - it was a coat you'd wear in winter, sort of like a padded jacket"

"I saw these police officers in uniform and out of uniform shouting 'get down, get down', and I saw this guy who appeared to have a bomb belt and wires coming out and people were panicking and I heard two shots being fired"

Yet in an article by the BBC today, you will find:

The latest documents suggest Mr de Menezes had walked into Stockwell Tube station, picked up a free newspaper, walked through ticket barriers, had started to run when he saw a train arriving and was sitting down in a train when he was shot.

In the immediate aftermath of the incident, police said Mr de Menezes had been acting suspiciously and suggested he had vaulted the ticket barriers.

Police also said the Brazilian electrician had worn a large winter-style coat - but the leaked version suggested he had in fact worn a denim jacket.

This version shows that "police" suggested Menezes had "vaulted" the ticket barrier and that they had said he was wearing "a large winter -style coat"

So which is correct? Did witnesses say these things or did the police? And if witnesses did give such statements, were they told to? But perhaps of additional concern is, how did the BBC manage to find so many people whose statements were clearly false?

We agree with the family of Jean Charles de Menezes that a public enquiry should be held, they have every right to see his murderers exposed for this execution. The British public should also be allowed to see exactly what is happening in their country now and what will happen to it (and its people) if these people are not stopped. Let's see these lies and cover-ups brought into the open and those responsible punished for their crimes. To let the officers involved "off" with some suspension or reduction in rank will be nothing more than a disgrace. Those who gave the orders to kill should also be dealt with in the strongest manner possible, whose actions are little better than the "terrorists" they claim they are protecting us from.

John O'Connor, the former Flying Squad commander, told the BBC the leaked report would cause "great embarrassment" to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair, adding he would be under pressure to "go".

Hopefully, if the British public ever get to see what the PM is up to, another Blair will join the Commissioner very soon! The sooner they both "go" the better.

This is perhaps a good example that the mainstream media (even the mighty BBC) can not be relied on for accuracy all the time. This is why we encourage people to look at as many different News sources as possible. Sadly, Google News used to provide a good mixture, but even they have resorted to displaying more mainstream sources now.

It is very much a catch 22 situation. In order to become "mainstream" you need a lot of readers. But if you are not allowed to do this, it is not possible!